Jeb has answered over 800 questions from voters/press compared to Hillary's 13. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 01:44:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Jeb has answered over 800 questions from voters/press compared to Hillary's 13. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Jeb has answered over 800 questions from voters/press compared to Hillary's 13.  (Read 1345 times)
Abraham Reagan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 2.96

« on: May 18, 2015, 03:38:32 PM »

Isn't this the same kind of thing that made some people not trust her back in 08? I think this article makes a good point about how while yes, Jeb has made some mistakes, he doesn't close himself off because of said mistakes. He's still out there meeting people and taking questions. Hillary on the other hand is blocked off to almost everyone, including the media, and she's not called on it. Double-standard much?

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/team-jeb-hes-held-to-different-standard-than-hillary/article/2564650
Logged
Abraham Reagan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 2.96

« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2015, 03:50:04 PM »

Why would she answer any questions from the sexist and anti-Clinton press?

Right, because the media is totally pro-Bush. If the media is being openly against you, call them on it; don't just square yourself away.
Logged
Abraham Reagan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: 2.96

« Reply #2 on: May 18, 2015, 04:44:21 PM »

Well, I guess Jeb shouldn't have answered so many questions then, because he flubbed up big on the Iraq question. If you answer 800 questions, chances are at least 1 of those is going to be a huge flub up. Do we really want a president who doesn't understand probability?

I'll refer to Teddy Roosevelt who said "In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing." So yes, I'd rather have a person for president who gets out there and tries but occasionally makes a mistake, than a person who makes no mistakes by doing nothing, AKA Clinton.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.