Should the Democrats just run "Dan Malloy" in every state from now on? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 10:48:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Should the Democrats just run "Dan Malloy" in every state from now on? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes, this is the best way to win Governor races		  
#2
No, that wouldn't be fair to the Republicans		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 33

Author Topic: Should the Democrats just run "Dan Malloy" in every state from now on?  (Read 1587 times)
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444
« on: November 06, 2014, 11:04:45 AM »
Malloy would get absolutely creamed in places not in New England or deep blue states.

Renegging on a promise not to raise taxes may keep you employed in New England, but not most of the rest of the country.
Logged
Recalcuate
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 444
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2014, 05:48:28 PM »
Quote from: MW Rep Vega on November 06, 2014, 05:41:20 PM
Conneticut kinda fell of everybody's radar until they remembered it like a week before election day.

He's lucky he wasn't running in literally any other state in New England except for maybe Vermont or Rhode Island.

Not true, I saw plenty of Malloy and Foley commercials in the NYC market.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.