IBD/TIPP nat. poll: D: Clinton 45% Sanders 43%; R: Trump 31% Cruz 20% Rubio 18%

[ProgressiveCanadian]

What happened to Clintonmentum? Looks like this confirms other recent tracking polls would love more national polls.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Clinton is only leading in the south. Maybe she is over pandering to the AA vote and not enough to the youth and whites.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.

You are completely missing the point. 

The poll indicates that Sanders is winning the midwest right now.  How on earth is the possibility of Sanders closing the gap in the future relevant?  Its not.  How on earth is when a primary contest is held relevant to the accuracy of the poll's results, when the poll's methodology is completely blind to when the state's contest is held? Its not. 

And the fact that you can literally only point to a single midwestern poll where Sanders is not down by double digits proves my point.

So it seems as though another Clinton supporter hates a poll showing her barley ahead nationally. If Sanders picks up more then a few states on Super Tuesday that would give him plenty of enough momentum. Also Ohio is mixed i would not call it a double digit win for anyone. Minnesota could easily give Sanders a big win. There are plenty of states that have not been polled regularly but it seems as though you love to cherry pick the ones that everyone else calls junk.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.

You are completely missing the point. 

The poll indicates that Sanders is winning the midwest right now.  How on earth is the possibility of Sanders closing the gap in the future relevant?  Its not.  How on earth is when a primary contest is held relevant to the accuracy of the poll's results, when the poll's methodology is completely blind to when the state's contest is held? Its not. 

And the fact that you can literally only point to a single midwestern poll where Sanders is not down by double digits proves my point.

So it seems as though another Clinton supporter hates a poll showing her barley ahead nationally. If Sanders picks up more then a few states on Super Tuesday that would give him plenty of enough momentum. Also Ohio is mixed i would not call it a double digit win for anyone. Minnesota could easily give Sanders a big win. There are plenty of states that have not been polled regularly but it seems as though you love to cherry pick the ones that everyone else calls junk.

Irony.

Obviously no response cause you have none. You are another one of the hacks that needs a Hillary logo. Still to early to call this race.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.

You are completely missing the point. 

The poll indicates that Sanders is winning the midwest right now.  How on earth is the possibility of Sanders closing the gap in the future relevant?  Its not.  How on earth is when a primary contest is held relevant to the accuracy of the poll's results, when the poll's methodology is completely blind to when the state's contest is held? Its not. 

And the fact that you can literally only point to a single midwestern poll where Sanders is not down by double digits proves my point.

So it seems as though another Clinton supporter hates a poll showing her barley ahead nationally. If Sanders picks up more then a few states on Super Tuesday that would give him plenty of enough momentum. Also Ohio is mixed i would not call it a double digit win for anyone. Minnesota could easily give Sanders a big win. There are plenty of states that have not been polled regularly but it seems as though you love to cherry pick the ones that everyone else calls junk.

Irony.

Obviously no response cause you have none. You are another one of the hacks that needs a Hillary logo. Still to early to call this race.

Again, irony.

I have one hack.