Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 01:06:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign?  (Read 2832 times)
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


« on: February 19, 2016, 12:14:50 PM »

Yes, it's why she's been dropping in the polls.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2016, 12:32:03 PM »

DOMA was an evil bill & Clinton should not have signed it - It set gay rights for a generation.

And the problem is not just 1996 but in 2007 she said the same when Obama openly said he supported Gay Marriage she said in a very brutal way "Marriage is between a man & a woman". It was much worse than Mitt Romney coming when it is coming from a so-called "Progressive" " No Champion of Gay Rights" Democrat candidate in 2007 when the other guy has supported it.

This was 2007, not 1996. She only turned in 2013 - when the whole country changed.

Does she deserve the gay vote over a candidate who was talking on GOP in 1995 for anti-gay speeches or voting against DOMA.

Are you completely illiterate? Read my post again.

I read that dumb post of yours & it was a pile of BS
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2016, 12:36:42 PM »

DOMA was an evil bill & Clinton should not have signed it - It set gay rights for a generation.

And the problem is not just 1996 but in 2007 she said the same when Obama openly said he supported Gay Marriage she said in a very brutal way "Marriage is between a man & a woman". It was much worse than Mitt Romney coming when it is coming from a so-called "Progressive" " No Champion of Gay Rights" Democrat candidate in 2007 when the other guy has supported it.

This was 2007, not 1996. She only turned in 2013 - when the whole country changed.

Does she deserve the gay vote over a candidate who was talking on GOP in 1995 for anti-gay speeches or voting against DOMA.

Are you completely illiterate? Read my post again.

I read that dumb post of yours & it was a pile of BS
how about the tow of you just go  off.  Most people here think you are hacks who don't no sh**t from shineola. 

Learn how to spell first.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2016, 12:51:31 PM »

DADT was always terrible I don't know how you could defend it. If Clinton was pro-gays why did she keep using the right wing talking point that marriage should be between a man and a woman?
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2016, 02:08:56 PM »

Although Sanders is a much better LGBT+ advocate, I believe that Clinton has redeemed herself on this issue, and that you should stop calling her out for it.

I'd be fine if Clinton admitted that she was always for gay rights then i wouldn't criticize. It's when she says she evolved on the issue that gets me. No you did not evolve Hillary (also same for Obama) you just supported gays when Americas opinion changed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.