Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 09:27:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST?  (Read 4781 times)
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00
« on: March 02, 2016, 02:22:34 AM »
The race is where it was before. Clinton is the clear favourite. The results were just more polarized than expected.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2016, 02:59:18 AM »
Sanders did overperform the last CO, MN polls massively, but same for Clinton in the south. CO, MN are not nearly as big prizes. If it happened in PA, OH, IL I would reconsider.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2016, 10:21:01 AM »
Let's dismiss this notion that Sanders only does well among white liberals. Only the white bit is true - whether they were liberal or not was more or less irrelevant.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2016, 11:26:24 AM »
That leaves out MN, CO though, where I'd guess whites were Sanders +28 and 24.
Also Sanders definitely won Iowa whites. Unless he got 80% of the barely existant non-white vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.