Modern Health Education Act (Final Vote) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 01:08:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Modern Health Education Act (Final Vote) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Modern Health Education Act (Final Vote)  (Read 4412 times)
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« on: June 26, 2015, 07:48:56 PM »

I think the slight ambiguity is acceptable since there ought to be flexibility in how the standards are interpreted.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2015, 08:09:32 PM »

Section 5 should be amended to outright ban the sale of junk food on schools. There's no reason why our schools should preach healthy eating while offering them junk food. I would accept students bringing such food to school if school policy allows for it.

Amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
(other sections omitted for clarity/space purposes)
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2015, 09:07:32 PM »

I say "limits" because I believe certain occasions justify the sale of "sometimes foods." What of bake sales or end-of-year parties?
Point taken. I table my previous amendment and reintroduce this one:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

My intention was more so to prevent unhealthy foods from being sold as school lunches than a complete ban. So this should avoid cases where non-school authorities distribute junk food as part of special events.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2015, 09:16:42 PM »
« Edited: June 26, 2015, 09:18:15 PM by New Canadaland »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
I didn't have lunch program in my school either. You could buy food but it was far cheaper and convenient to bring something from food. But most of the schools which this bill pertains to do have such programs, I believe.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
That's why I specified school lunch programs in my second amendment. Food offered at events that aren't meant to be meals won't be affected. And the original bill and my amendment specified that junk food is to be limited but not necessarily eliminated. Depending on the definition of junk food though, some popcorn and hot dogs may not even be classified as junk food.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
I wouldn't mind the inclusion of a definition of junk food. But I don't want too precise a definition that would leave local administrators with no leeway. I'd like Hagrid to tell us what he had in mind for the definition of junk food when he drafted the bill.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2015, 10:08:30 PM »

Section 1b stipulates distribution of junk food on school property.  Most sporting events are on school property.
It says they should be "limits or eliminates" which is the original text. My amendment changes nothing in that regard. That said, "limit" is not defined here although if the school boards made the choice I'd imagine almost all would go with a fairly liberal interpretation of limit rather than prohibiting it altogether.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2015, 09:39:49 PM »

The costs of preparing food onsite is too high, considering I don't approve of raising food prices in schools.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2015, 09:53:18 PM »

An average nutrient density mean that foods under 30 would be acceptable so long as there were more foods over 30, right?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.