If the vaccine works and is safe and effective that's wonderful, but it should not be administered at the point of a gun. People should be free to decide for themselves.
Agreed. To the best of my knowledge cervical cancer is not an easily communicatable disease, and is thus not a generalized health threat.
I would be fine with the state suggesting such a move, or even recomending it, but requiring it goes a bit too far IMO.
I agree with James...there needs to be a balance between the state protecting the health of its citizens and the right to refuse the vaccine
When the disease isn't communicatable, and the person refusing it (or Guardians refusing on the kid's behalf) is the only one who incurs the risk of harm (from not taking it)...then it should be optional...not mandatory
