The legal consecration of the already existing spacial segregation is a tragedy and a sign that Israel might evolve towards undemocratic forms of state. Terrible development.
This part was taken out of the law because President Rivlin didn't like it.
The question is whether there is any need to reaffirm this fact with ornamental legislation, given the antagonism (rightly or wrongly) it will cause.
"Nationalism for me, but not for thee", Santander?
I mean, I'd imagine it rather common for one nation's "nationalists" to not have a vested interest in the success of another nation's "nationalists," no?