Why did Gore do so well in the Lower Northeast (RI, CT, NY, NJ)? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:59:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Gore do so well in the Lower Northeast (RI, CT, NY, NJ)? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Gore do so well in the Lower Northeast (RI, CT, NY, NJ)?  (Read 2999 times)
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,394
United States


« on: November 29, 2023, 01:55:30 AM »

Lieberman probably helped in this part of the world, especially among Jews, although Gore paid dearly for that pick elsewhere. Although Gore was reticent to tie himself too strongly to Clinton, there was much goodwill from that administration in the region (see the 92-96 swings in these states) that seems to have held over enough for Gore to pull off surprising wins in Bush-Bush-Clinton counties like Monmouth, NJ, and Richmond, NY.

Gore did not "pay dearly" for having Lieberman on the ticket. He was an asset at the time who nearly helped Gore win Florida.

Or he could've just gone with Bob Graham to actually secure Florida.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.