How come popular incumbent governors usually lose their own state? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 23, 2024, 11:44:37 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion

Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)

How come popular incumbent governors usually lose their own state? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Author

Topic: How come popular incumbent governors usually lose their own state? (Read 600 times)

Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 33,364

« on: July 03, 2017, 04:49:44 PM »

Quote from: Santander on July 03, 2017, 04:20:37 PM

Quote from: politicalmasta73 on July 03, 2017, 02:47:49 PM

Gilmore 2008 senate bid, got crushed

Gilmore was neither an incumbent governor nor popular in 2008...

And he ran against a very popular former Governor.

And besides Weld for Senate, whom else is there?

Maggie Hassan won thanks to Hillary coattails

Jerry Brown actually wasn't popular and was running against MH Stinky Pete AND St. Ronnie during his go-ahead, and he was out of office for some time when he tried his hand against Bill in '92.

Don't know of others.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.