We have to have vetting-don't Democrats get it? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 07:48:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  We have to have vetting-don't Democrats get it? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: We have to have vetting-don't Democrats get it?  (Read 1147 times)
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« on: January 29, 2017, 02:49:01 AM »

The vetting the United States has is much better than that of Germany,Sweden, or other countries that have had problems with refugees. A better solution if there is a legitimate terror threat is to process potential refugees through territories such as guam
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2017, 03:00:06 AM »

A better solution if there is a legitimate terror threat is to process potential refugees through territories such as guam

You can't just shuffle people around like cattle.  If you expect these people to integrate into the American community, detaining them in Guam is not going to be helpful.
Refugees by definition intend to go back to their country of origin once the conflict is over, they are not immigrants. We can protect and take care of refugees while still keeping track of them
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.