At this point I think so. I don't see Trump, Cruz, or even Rubio beating Clinton in 2016, and she'll probably have a strong enough first term to win again in 2020. Then the GOP would have to get its act together and nominate someone who could beat her VP, which isn't guaranteed to happen. Letting Bush into the White House was a terrible mistake on the GOP's part. It will haunt them for ages.
Democratic party in the white house permanently? You know having one party control is bad for the country correct? North Korea and Vietnam come to mind.
OK. So what's the solution if the country, you know, keeps voting for the same party? Is it for that party to unilaterally disarm because one party rule is bad? I never understood this objection.