If the GOP keeps losing, when would a viable replacement party emerge? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 02:20:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  If the GOP keeps losing, when would a viable replacement party emerge? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: At which presidential election?
#1
2020
 
#2
2024
 
#3
2028
 
#4
2032
 
#5
2036
 
#6
2040
 
#7
2044
 
#8
After 2044
 
#9
Never would happen
 
#10
The Dems. would be challenged from the left
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 58

Author Topic: If the GOP keeps losing, when would a viable replacement party emerge?  (Read 5629 times)
Slander and/or Libel
Figs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,338


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.83

« on: May 05, 2015, 06:45:19 AM »

The GOP would just become more conservative

Because insufficient conservatism is always the explanation for a loss.
Logged
Slander and/or Libel
Figs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,338


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.83

« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2015, 08:17:40 AM »

2016, is gonna be a close; competetive campaign. The economy is growing at 0.2 percent.  I wouldnt be so confident if I were the Dems. They can risk playing it safe like the did in 2014; and Jeb Bush can sneak up, like they did before. In either case, whoever wins the prez, will still have a slow economy to deal with.

Jeb isnt going to be the nominee and he certainly wont be President

First assertion: untrue.
Second assertion: true.
Logged
Slander and/or Libel
Figs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,338


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.83

« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2015, 07:14:22 AM »

2016, is gonna be a close; competetive campaign. The economy is growing at 0.2 percent.  I wouldnt be so confident if I were the Dems. They can risk playing it safe like the did in 2014; and Jeb Bush can sneak up, like they did before. In either case, whoever wins the prez, will still have a slow economy to deal with.

Jeb isnt going to be the nominee and he certainly wont be President

First assertion: untrue.
Second assertion: true.

History (liberals seem to love historical inevitability), says that 2016 will not only be close, but closer than 2012 (which was the 3rd closest re-election in US history). You have to go back t0 1904, to see where a party running for its third term won by a larger margin than in the previous election.

I believe you were responding to a different post than the one you quoted.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.