2018 Michigan Senate (PPP) - Stabenow has large leads despite lukewarm approval (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 10:03:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Michigan Senate (PPP) - Stabenow has large leads despite lukewarm approval (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2018 Michigan Senate (PPP) - Stabenow has large leads despite lukewarm approval  (Read 2397 times)
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,937
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
« on: July 01, 2015, 03:29:42 PM »

Stabenow (D) - 47%
Amash (R) - 34%

Stabenow (D) - 47%
Calley (R) - 34%

Stabenow (D) - 45%
Johnson (R) - 37%

Republican Primary:

Calley - 13%
Amash - 12%
Bishop - 10%
Johnson - 10%
McDaniel - 6%

Stabenow Approval:

Approve: 42%
Disapprove: 39%

Sen. Peters (D) Approval:

Disapprove: 32%
Approve: 30%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_MI_7115.pdf
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,937
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2015, 03:49:51 PM »


His approval is 40-47, but they didn't put him in a senate matchup.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,937
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2015, 05:06:25 PM »


She'd lose by double digits again.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,937
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2015, 12:49:12 PM »


She'd lose by double digits again.
You think so?  Most of the reason she lost so badly to Peters is because she never found her campaign message and let Peters smear her with sexist attacks.  If she runs again, she will have hopefully learned from her mistakes last time.

No, she lost because her campaign was nothing more than a hot mess with no theme at all other than, "I want to be Senator, so vote for me."

Oh, and while we're at it, name one "sexist attack." Is being bought and paid for as a puppet of the Koch brothers now sexist?

He's probably referring to the whole "War on Women" stuff, which land responded to with this joke of an ad:

http://youtu.be/dc_AAje-4l0
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.