What would Atlas be like if it existed in the past?

[Xing]

VARepublican Sr. Member ★★★★★ Posts: 4,515

Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « on: July 20, 1964 at 9:57:03 am » Johnson 49 Goldwater 46

SirWoodbury Sr. Member ★★★★★ Posts: 3,915

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « on: July 20, 1964 at 9:58:46 am » Let the slaughtering begin.

SN2903 Concerned Citizen ★★★★★ Posts: 7,915

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « on: July 20, 1964 at 9:59:23 am » Game over, Dems. We're taking the House and the Senate, too!

Silent Moderate MAModerate Atlas Icon ★★★★★ Posts: 11,537

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « on: July 20, 1964 at 10:02:41 am » I TOLD you all that the Civil Rights Act was a mistake! I knew that it was political suicide that would doom Johnson in the South and hand the Republicans a majority for a generation. Goldwater is going to blow Johnson out of the water with white Independents. Democrats never learn when to quit.

SnowLabrador Concerned Citizen ★★★★★ Posts: 6,236

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:05:01 am » Yeah, Goldwater probably wins by double digits, and Republicans take both the House and the Senate, at this point. Illinois, Michigan, and Texas are probably Safe R, at this point.

Roosevelt/Truman/Stevenson/ Stevenson/Kennedy voter for Goldwater S019 Atlas Icon ★★★★★ Posts: 18,309

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:11:33 am » Come on, it's one poll. You're all overreacting, Johnson is still ahead by 8 in the polling average.

Blatt-wanter 19DE52 Atlas Star ★★★★★ Posts: 21,918

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:14:29 am » Yeah, you all are so predictable. This poll is obvious junk.

ElectionsGuy Atlas Star ★★★★★ Posts: 21,918

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:16:51 am » Of course Democratic hacks are dismissing this poll that doesn't confirm their desired result. Polls massively underestimated Nixon in 1960, and red avatars are still acting as though polls and the media don't have a consistent Democratic bias. But of course, any poll that doesn't show Johnson up by at least 10 will never be taken seriously.

Ferguson41 Atlas Icon ★★★★★ Posts: 10,477

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « on: July 20, 1964 at 10:17:48 am » This poll is 97% white, throw it in the trash. I TOLD you all that the Civil Rights Act was a mistake! I knew that it was political suicide that would doom Johnson in the South and hand the Republicans a majority for a generation. Goldwater is going to blow Johnson out of the water with white Independents. Democrats never learn when to quit. So Johnson should just allow segregationists to run the country?

Roll Roons Atlas Icon ★★★★★ Posts: 7,236

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « on: July 20, 1964 at 10:22:14 am » WHY didn't we nominate Rockefeller?

Hsing hsingkojuei Atlas Star ★★★★★ Posts: 26,716

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:30:56 am » Not likely, Johnson is probably ahead by more than this, but I still don't think he can take this race for granted. Lean/Likely D for now, but Goldwater could outright say that only whites should be allowed to vote and still get 42% of the vote.

MR. RAY CHARLES olawakandi Atlas Legend ★★★★★ Posts: 64,950

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:35:20 am » Not likely, Johnson is probably ahead by more than this, but I still don't think he can take this race for granted. Lean/Likely D for now, but Goldwater could outright say that only whites should be allowed to vote and still get 42% of the vote. ßtop playing Hsing RASSY had Nixon up in IL, MI, Johnson wins MIDWEST MOUND IL, MI, MO, WI, OH is not a R state.

Mine eyes have seen the glory of the defeat of Goldwater BRTD Atlas Institution ★★★★★ Posts: 101,632

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « December 2, 1964 at 1:14:02 am » LMFAO and to think people bought this!

[Xing]

Hsing hsingkoruei Atlas Star ★★★★★ Posts: 26,716

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:30:56 am » Not likely, Johnson is probably ahead by more than this, but I still don't think he can take this race for granted. Lean/Likely D for now, but Goldwater could outright say that only whites should be allowed to vote and still get 42% of the vote.

The Wade-Giles here is an amazing touch, but I am pretty sure "ruei" is wrong - also, I wonder why you imagined yourself in New York state.

What else would it be? There’s a fair amount still used in Taiwan, and often ui finals (in pinyin) are written as uei (e.g. “Rui Feng” in pinyin is written as “Ruei Feng.”) Mt family lived in New York at this time, thus the avatar.

[Xing]

Hsing hsingkoruei Atlas Star ★★★★★ Posts: 26,716

Re: Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « July 20, 1964 at 10:30:56 am » Not likely, Johnson is probably ahead by more than this, but I still don't think he can take this race for granted. Lean/Likely D for now, but Goldwater could outright say that only whites should be allowed to vote and still get 42% of the vote.

The Wade-Giles here is an amazing touch, but I am pretty sure "ruei" is wrong - also, I wonder why you imagined yourself in New York state.

What else would it be? There’s a fair amount still used in Taiwan, and often ui finals (in pinyin) are written as uei (e.g. “Rui Feng” in pinyin is written as “Ruei Feng.”) Mt family lived in New York at this time, thus the avatar.

Isn't the r of pinyin a j in Wade-Giles? Anyway, this is just a nitpick because I am a pedant. The post overall was a great work.

Ah, that’s right, good catch. I guess my username would’ve been even uglier back then.

VARepublican Sr. Member ★★★★★ Posts: 4,515

Rasmussen: Johnson +3 « on: July 20, 1964 at 9:57:03 am » Johnson 49 Goldwater 46

snip

You brought up Big Lyndon without including me?

Whoops, though you don’t always comment as much on polls, I guess that’s why it didn’t occur to me.