Why did so many Senators/Senatorial nominees underperform so much? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 08:55:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why did so many Senators/Senatorial nominees underperform so much? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did so many Senators/Senatorial nominees underperform so much?  (Read 646 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: November 08, 2018, 06:59:06 PM »

Polarization and partisanship matter much more than incumbency.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2018, 07:03:23 PM »

Polarization and partisanship matter much more than incumbency.

This hasn't always been true, though. Why did they manifest to such an extent this year?

Well, it was very true in 2016. We've just become very divided and uninterested in other points of view, and more and more races have become nationalized. You saw it in the House too, with a lot of Republican incumbents in Democratic-leaning districts doing worse than Trump, even though Trump did badly in their districts. It was certainly quite extreme this year, but it's not exactly sudden. We're been getting progressively more polarized and partisan for years now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.