Senate: will Democrats win Arizona, Nevada, or Missouri? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 03:24:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Senate: will Democrats win Arizona, Nevada, or Missouri? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: 16 day poll
#1
Arizona
 
#2
Nevada
 
#3
Missouri
 
#4
none of the above
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Senate: will Democrats win Arizona, Nevada, or Missouri?  (Read 1332 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: October 16, 2018, 09:40:11 AM »

Atlas is so preeictable. Of course you all are buying an EMERSON poll (of Nevada, no less) that is completely out of line with other polls. Atlas tried to argue that Trump and Heck would win Nevada because polls showed a similar thing (though about two weeks before this current point in the election), and people said I was crazy for thinking that they’d both lose, even in a good night for Republicans. We all saw how that turned out. People never learn.

Anyway, Democrats will win Nevada unless it’s a 2014-style red wave, while Arizona and Missouri will be close. Right now, I think Democrats win Arizona and Republicans win Missouri. #FundamentalsMatter
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2018, 12:15:04 PM »

You underestimate the power of incumbency in most cycles, which is why McCaskill has a fighting chance in Missouri.

Heller has a lead in Nevada right now from all the recent polling. With that said, I do think NV is way more vulnerable than AZ for the Republicans.


Atlas is so preeictable. Of course you all are buying an EMERSON poll (of Nevada, no less) that is completely out of line with other polls. Atlas tried to argue that Trump and Heck would win Nevada because polls showed a similar thing (though about two weeks before this current point in the election), and people said I was crazy for thinking that they’d both lose, even in a good night for Republicans. We all saw how that turned out. People never learn.

Anyway, Democrats will win Nevada unless it’s a 2014-style red wave, while Arizona and Missouri will be close. Right now, I think Democrats win Arizona and Republicans win Missouri. #FundamentalsMatter

Here's the thing about incumbency. It helps when an incumbent is popular and has strong ties to their state, or when it's a good year for their party. Incumbency isn't exactly helping Rauner in IL-GOV, but it's invaluable to someone like Baker in MA-GOV. Why? Popularity. It's also why Manchin is in better shape than McCaskill. Polls have consistently shown Heller to be unpopular, sometimes less popular than Trump in NV, and this isn't looking to be a good year for Republicans.

All in all, it's more believable that polls are underestimating Democrats in NV, which has happened many times before, than it is that there's going to be a red wave or that NV will swing massively Republican even during a blue wave.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2018, 01:04:58 AM »

Missouri. McCaskill always figures out a way to eke out a win.

Nevada is looking increasingly unlikely. Arizona will revert back to normal form. Keep in mind they had a late primary and are still "healing' per se.

Turns out the unpopular Democratic incumbent in the Republican-trending Trump +18 state and the unpopular Republican incumbent in the Democratic-trending Clinton +3 state both lost, while Democrats picked up the open seat in the Democratic-trending Trump +3 state in a Democratic wave year. Who would have thought?

Well, some of us thought that, but we just have "obsessions" or something like that. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.