Frank Rich: "No Sympathy for the Hillbilly" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 04:52:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Frank Rich: "No Sympathy for the Hillbilly" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Frank Rich: "No Sympathy for the Hillbilly"  (Read 6546 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,325
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: March 27, 2017, 01:35:48 PM »

There is a lot of this attitude ("Anyone who disagrees with me a stupid racist sexist Nazi POS!") on the Democratic side, unfortunately. (Let's not pretend that there isn't a similar attitude on the right, but I digress...) This is not a productive attitude, and it's certainly not going to serve any of us well in the future. While it's true that many Trump supporters are not going to be convinced to turn against him, there are certainly some who could potentially be swayed. The type of argument presented in this article is what has pushed many people away from the Democratic Party. Also, maybe convincing people in rural America to pull the lever in the voting booth a certain way shouldn't be our end goal. Perhaps empathy should be about recognizing that we don't have to see each other as enemies, rather than just winning elections.

One thing I do want to point out, though, is that I think that the pain from Trump winning is still very fresh for a lot of people on the left. Lashing out at those who made it possible is the only way some people have of dealing with that pain. I don't defend what Frank Rich said. Of course constantly attacking all Trump voters is not the right way to go. Still, many people saw Trump's election as a giant middle finger being shoved in their face. I know many women who think that the "lesson" from this election is that no matter how qualified and hard-working a woman is, a morally reprehensible man is still preferable. I know immigrants and Muslims who take his election as this country's way of saying "you don't belong here. This is my country. Get out."

I would urge conservatives to try and see why people are so upset about Trump, rather than dismissing them as "sore loser crybabies" or saying that they just have "Trump derangement syndrome." Empathy needs to go both ways, or in other words, "both sides need to do it."
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,325
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2017, 12:37:19 PM »

There is a lot of this attitude ("Anyone who disagrees with me a stupid racist sexist Nazi POS!") on the Democratic side, unfortunately. (Let's not pretend that there isn't a similar attitude on the right, but I digress...) This is not a productive attitude, and it's certainly not going to serve any of us well in the future. While it's true that many Trump supporters are not going to be convinced to turn against him, there are certainly some who could potentially be swayed. The type of argument presented in this article is what has pushed many people away from the Democratic Party. Also, maybe convincing people in rural America to pull the lever in the voting booth a certain way shouldn't be our end goal. Perhaps empathy should be about recognizing that we don't have to see each other as enemies, rather than just winning elections.

I think the problem with the quest for empathy is that people are so deeply obsessed with "whataboutism" that we can't actually acknowledge that there are many different problems. Any human being wants their problems focused on first rather than someone else's, that much seems logical. The issue is that a lot of people fail to comprehend (whether that's our own failure as a society for not instilling that form of critical thinking or something else) that there are multiple problems that multiple groups of people are dealing with and that all of these should be addressed, not just one at a time and not just in piecemeal. A black man still probably going to be more socioeconomically disadvantaged for example than the median white man, and would probably have the cops called on him more often than the so-called "hillbilly", but they both have economic problems that must be handled. But the challenge is making everyone understand that everyone else has their own issues to deal with that are very complex and that nobody's problems are relatively speaking more special than anyone else's would probably be the biggest hurdle toward any kind of empathy.

That's a good point, and it usually requires empathy for people to acknowledge that the problems others face are just as real as the problems they face themselves, so this issue can end up being kind of circular. Also, many people want a quick fix; they want someone to wave a magic wand and make their problems disappear with one simple piece of legislation. I'm not suggesting that trying to have empathy is going to instantly destroy all animosity that exists between various groups in this country, but if enough people can strive to be more empathetic, that might be a start.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.