IN-Monmouth: Trump +4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 03:39:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  IN-Monmouth: Trump +4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IN-Monmouth: Trump +4  (Read 4329 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,312
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« on: October 14, 2016, 12:06:59 PM »

Trump will probably hold on here, but this doesn't suggest he's winning Ohio. Those Senate and Gubernatorial numbers look too good to be true.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,312
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2016, 05:39:45 PM »

I don't understand the Trump/Bayh voters.

Yeah, they're morons (just like Trump/Kander voters), especially if they identify as conservatives. Welcome to American politics, where last names, nice ads and looks matter more than issues.

(Same is true for Democrats who vote for Susan Collins, for example.)

Would you be just as happy to call Clinton/Toomey, Clinton/Flawless Beautiful Marco Purple heart Purple heart Purple heart, and Clinton/Heck voters morons? Tongue
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,312
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2016, 05:58:38 PM »

I don't understand the Trump/Bayh voters.

Yeah, they're morons (just like Trump/Kander voters), especially if they identify as conservatives. Welcome to American politics, where last names, nice ads and looks matter more than issues.

(Same is true for Democrats who vote for Susan Collins, for example.)

Would you be just as happy to call Clinton/Toomey, Clinton/Flawless Beautiful Marco Purple heart Purple heart Purple heart, and Clinton/Heck voters morons? Tongue

Of course not. Those are coherent, informed votes.

Please do elaborate. A check on Hillary Clinton? That could explain Clinton/Kirk voters, but not Clinton/conservative obstructionist R voters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.