Should SCOTUS justices be elected? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 01:18:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should SCOTUS justices be elected? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No, but their time on SCOTUS should be limited.
 
#3
No, and they should receive lifetime appointments as IRL.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 83

Author Topic: Should SCOTUS justices be elected?  (Read 1702 times)
Hamster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 260
WWW
« on: April 12, 2014, 09:43:57 PM »

No, they shouldn't be elected. They should, however, have term limits. A nine-year term would be an elegant solution. Divide the justices into three classes and have the classes turn over at three year intervals. It's the same principle as the staggering of senate races, just with different term lengths and change by appointment rather than election. This schema would also give every president the same amount of influence over the court (as they would always appoint three justices-- or six if they served two terms). That way, the partisan makeup of the court is more closely tied to the partisan mood of the country.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 16 queries.