Oregon Set to Pass Free Funding of Abortions (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 02:46:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Oregon Set to Pass Free Funding of Abortions (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Oregon Set to Pass Free Funding of Abortions  (Read 3094 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,372
Kiribati


« on: July 07, 2017, 01:22:17 PM »

I think this could be an ideal starting point for a compromise legislation - have it free and easy for the relatively unproblematic (both ethically and health-wise) first trimester non surgical abortions and heavily restrict later abortions.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,372
Kiribati


« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2017, 01:24:44 PM »


Hey all you guys here, remember that YOUR gender is responsible for ALL pregnancies that occur.

It's so easy for men to talk about abortion with only the females in mind. YOUR private part was included in the fun. If ALL men took precautions when they had sex with females, then there would be FAR FEWER pregnancies.

Men are just as responsible for not bringing unwanted children in the world as females are. Both parties need to take responsibility when they have sex.

I am especially tired of hearing all the moralistic men out there judging females wanting abortions and being against help for females having them. Then do your part and never have unprotected sex unless you are definitely wanting children.

There are many factors that go into a female's decision to have an abortion that men cannot fathom. Keep your moralistic judgment for your own actions.





If it's any consolation, this is atlas. 99% of the men here will never be in a situation where impregnating a woman is a realistic outcome.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,372
Kiribati


« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2017, 03:12:27 AM »

I think this could be an ideal starting point for a compromise legislation - have it free and easy for the relatively unproblematic (both ethically and health-wise) first trimester non surgical abortions and heavily restrict later abortions.

Isn't that how Europe does it? I'd be fine with heavy restrictions anywhere after 24 weeks but YMMV (obviously those restrictions would have to have exceptions for rape/incest/threat to mother's life)

It is in the UK, but I think there are co-payments in some European countries.

Tbh if one could get free and quick early abortions, I don't really see anything wrong with kicking in the restrictions even earlier, like 15 weeks. People don't have abortions that late outside of strict medical reasons, so you might as well close the pro-life fears of superfluous late term abortions.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.