Clarence Thomas mulls retirement (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 04:18:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Clarence Thomas mulls retirement (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clarence Thomas mulls retirement  (Read 2766 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,353
Kiribati


« on: June 19, 2016, 02:45:39 PM »

Lol
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,353
Kiribati


« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2016, 04:51:43 PM »

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE

So now we're going to have a 6-3 D court? Awesome.

How's that awesome? That would be a disaster. The US would never recover from that calamity.

Looks like poor Ljube is afraid of progress Sad

That's not progress. That's tyranny.


So going through the Constitutional process of appointing judges to the Supreme Court is tyranny? Mhm, I understand now.

Don't play dumb! You know damn well what tyranny means!

Tyranny is an unbalanced, politically activist Supreme Court rubber stumping decrees of a tyrannical Emperor.


Aren't activist judges normally accused of legislating from the bench (i.e. disagreeing with elected officials too much)? You are describing an overly passive bench.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.