Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 04:56:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will the Paid Speech Question followed by LBGT Rights damage Clinton's campaign?  (Read 2823 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,375
Kiribati


« on: February 19, 2016, 04:14:43 PM »

Because the Clintons (and Obama) hid their blatent support of gay rights behind weasel words, they would get elected and be able to nominate Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan and Sotomayor. Perhaps you'd have preferred if they weren't elected at all on by endorsing a policy rejected wholesale by the majority of Americans at the time; with the result that there would probably be a Federal Marriage Amendment, Section 28 style legislation and a judicary overwhelmingly against gay rights?
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,375
Kiribati


« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2016, 04:41:25 PM »

Obama claimed to support SSM when he was running in 1996. I don't when the Clintons started supporting it, but I highly doubt it was anything near when they claim to have changed their mind. I mean, the Clinton's aren't exactly earnest church types are they?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 14 queries.