What states have a significant "environment vs. extraction " polarization? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 12:20:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  What states have a significant "environment vs. extraction " polarization? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What states have a significant "environment vs. extraction " polarization?  (Read 476 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,372
Kiribati


« on: July 22, 2014, 07:06:09 AM »
Colorado, at a guess. Mainly because a lot of established interests (tourism, the skiing companies, California transplants) have interests against fracking; while the fossil fuel industry obviously has a lot of interests in favour. Witness Udall and Hickenlooper's seemingly endless triangulation around the issue.

States with a high population of Native Americans also come to mind.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.