Cue everyone being offended by Clinton acknowledging the reality while continuing to give everyone who uses "coastal elites" a pass as millions of average Californians, New Yorkers, etc... get written off. Her acknowledging the situation doesn't mean she views those people as lesser; talking about the racial motivations that Trump exploited for his path to victory is something that needs to be spoken about candidly rather than swept under the rug of 'economic anxiety'.
What about the racial motivations of people who voted for Clinton? Clinton supporters openly say their goal is to make the country less white. Nancy Pelosi was crying on the house floor talking about how beautiful it was.
Taking systematic advantages whites/males/etc... have and systematic disadvantages minorities/females/etc... have out of the equation is not 'trying to make the country less white'. Celebrating our diversity and the strength our country has with the many unique cultural backgrounds its citizens possess is not a bad thing. Bridging the gap of opportunity between whites/miniorites/males/females/etc... is a good thing. Further pushing down minorities/females/etc... so whites/males/etc... can enjoy advantages at their expense is not.
True. But tell me how diversity can be good in places like Brentwood, LI, where MS-13 is wrecking havoc.
Yes, giving minorities EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES , not equal outcomes with white people's money is good.
Unchecked open borders is not. 
