opebo Week: A Celebration of His Life & Times (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 03:43:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  opebo Week: A Celebration of His Life & Times (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: opebo Week: A Celebration of His Life & Times  (Read 9918 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


« on: January 05, 2015, 01:54:03 PM »

Btw, while I don't share NAMBLA's predelictions, I do applaud their fight for freedom.

I would be more likely to vote with my party if they ran a NAMBLA member.

NAMBLA of course is a political organization, but free-lance pedophiles are freedom fighters as well.

And anyway, 12 would be considered plenty old enough in a civilized country.

Hopefully upon aquital Michael [Jackson] will leave this benighted land and go live in some decent country where his sexuality will not be attacked by a lot of intolerants.  On the other hand it would be cool if he would stick around and speak out publicly on behalf of NAMBLA.

As I have said often, I support people having the right to this type of behaviour, while not sharing an interest in it personally.

That said, I do 'endorse' pedophelia and the freedom fighters that practice it, though without sharing their predelictions.  Anyway, what does pedophilia have to do with 13 year olds?  They're pubescents, not children.

Some 15 year olds look older than some 20 year olds.  It all depends on race, body type, and developement.  My point would be that at 15 most girls have gone through puberty, and are pregnable.

My subjective preference is - they start to look attractive to me somewhere in the 14-16 age range.

NAMBLA fights for freedom in the realm of ideas - they are not a beauty pageant!

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Don't forget his Roman Polanski commentary:

people who want to prosecute Statutory rape= prudes? WTF

Yes, the sexually liberated position would be that the 'statutory' aspect makes it oppression.

If a fellow has sex with a teen who is a few years under the 'age of consent', it isn't a sign of any tendency or 'predatory' behavior.  At most it is a sign of bad judgement.  I really can't see how one could call it reasonable to blame him at all for having sex with what appeared to be a woman who had without a doubt voluntarily attended a drug-and-sex party in the late 1960s (where having sex was virtually a given).  But even if you did chose to enforce the letter of the law, how could one justify more than a few months sentence?  
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.