Phil Gingrey, a doctor (or does he count as like a "self loathing doctor" or something? You know, like the black Republicans/Tea Partiers?), should not be allowed to speak on this. He should be ashamed of himself. Doesn't he know the narrative is already set?
Wow, so when a 13 year old get pregnant with her uncles child, she's not a victim, but just a slut?
...what?
It's the logical conclusion of the argument, that if she become pregnant she was a willing partipant, and that could have some interesting consequence, as she could be tried as a adult for breaking the law against incest and as such even if she avoided imprisonment she would be registered as sex offender.
This may sound insane, but as minors have been prosecuted (for child pornography)) for taking naked pictures of themselves and giving them to their boyfriends (which later spread them), I would say it's a likely risk.
Huh? What sense does that make? You're saying that if you can prove that a child younger than the age of consent was "a willing participant" in a sex act with an adult relative, that she can be tried as an adult for incest? Do you understand how the age of consent works?
