PM Series: Question 22 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 06:22:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  PM Series: Question 22 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Union workers should be protected against being fired during strikes.
#1
Agree
 
#2
Usually Agree
 
#3
Neutral
 
#4
Usually Disagree
 
#5
Disagree
 
#6
Critical Issue
 
#7
Not a Critical Issue
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 54

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: PM Series: Question 22  (Read 1163 times)
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


« on: September 23, 2014, 08:51:02 AM »

Disagree/Non-Critical

People who don't work eventually get fired. It's gravity in the labor market. Unions can try to fight it with labor laws and shareholder intimidation, but their jobs will get sent out-of-state or overseas, and automation will take more jobs. Unions are supposed to be providing a valuable service to the company and to the employees. Strike has zero value-added to anyone in the long run.
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2014, 11:09:31 AM »

Unions are not supposed to provide a service to employers. The point of a union is to act as the representative of the worker and as an intractable enemy of the employer in every possible instance, because the union is supposed to seek higher wages, better benefits, and better working conditions for its members. That's what a union is. Unions that are buddy-buddy with the employer might as well be company unions (like the UAW has basically become, at this point) because they don't represent the people who pay dues to them and elect their leadership.

It's comforting to know, especially for all of those who've lost their manufacturing jobs, that you are dedicated to the moral purity of the labor movement, regardless of the outcomes achieved.
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2014, 01:08:36 PM »

It's comforting to know that you continue to be a vapid idiot with no conception of what working is actually like in the real world. If a union bends over backwards for the boss, it might as well not be there, because it's betraying the workers who pay it dues.

I think you've identified yourself as the vapid idiot with no employment experience (or you've learned nothing).

No one bends over backwards. People trade. Strike is not trade leverage, nor does it promote economic growth. It's a form of extortion--give us what we want or we will harm you. What is the natural reaction of white collar workers when their careers, benefits, etc, as well as the economic well-being of their homeland, are threatened by union strikes at their employer?

If unions weren't run by morons, perhaps they'd have more members and create fewer enemies. Maybe their management of legacy costs wouldn't require taxpayer bailouts.

You're just like any other addict. The intervention is an affront. Masochism is your source of positive affirmation. Get help. Stop failing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.