Agree or disagree: criminalization of something is only useful if doing so reduces it from happening (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 01:56:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Agree or disagree: criminalization of something is only useful if doing so reduces it from happening (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Agree or disagree: The criminal justice system should seek to reduce crime, and the criminalization of an action is only worthwhile if criminalizing it actually reduces that action from happening.
#1
Agree
 
#2
Disagree
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Agree or disagree: criminalization of something is only useful if doing so reduces it from happening  (Read 973 times)
beaver2.0
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,776


Political Matrix
E: -2.45, S: -0.52

P P

« on: September 22, 2021, 09:01:46 PM »

I disagree.....even if murder being illegal didn't decrease the rate of murder, it should still be illegal.

This is what I was thinking.  There are some things that should be crimes regardless of any other factors (murder, rape, terrorism) so I disagree with the initial question.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.