McInnes assaulted at NYU. Pepperspayed. Professor advocated violence. 11 arrests

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

I watched a Gavin McInnes video once, he was yelling at fat girls or something.  It was weird to watch, but I don't see how he's a Nazi.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

How is Gavin McInnes a Nazi?  I want someone to answer.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

Richard Spencer is a Nazi, is anyone denying that?

But what does Gavin McInnes have to do with Richard Spencer?

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

This is Antifa.



What's the likelihood of it being a white person who made this?

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

Richard Spencer is a Nazi, is anyone denying that?

But what does Gavin McInnes have to do with Richard Spencer?

Spencer is not a Nazi or a white supremacist. He is a white nationalist troll with some very bad views.

Doesn't he believe that Jews are trying to genocide white people or something?

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

McInnes is utter garbage, but he's obviously not a Nazi, as he married a non white woman and has mixed kids.

Racist men often marry out of race to assert their superiority. This is not evidence.

It is evidence that he is not a Nazi. To a Nazi him mixing his blood with a non white is treason to his race and his ancestors.

White supremacist then.

Why would a White Supremacist have a non-white wife?  This isn't "I have a black friend" this is someone choosing to spend the rest of their lives with someone of another race.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

McInnes is utter garbage, but he's obviously not a Nazi, as he married a non white woman and has mixed kids.

Racist men often marry out of race to assert their superiority. This is not evidence.

It is evidence that he is not a Nazi. To a Nazi him mixing his blood with a non white is treason to his race and his ancestors.

White supremacist then.

Why would a White Supremacist have a non-white wife?  This isn't "I have a black friend" this is someone choosing to spend the rest of their lives with someone of another race.

Why would a sexist anti-feminist have a wife?

Racism works differently than sexism.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

McInnes is utter garbage, but he's obviously not a Nazi, as he married a non white woman and has mixed kids.

Racist men often marry out of race to assert their superiority. This is not evidence.

It is evidence that he is not a Nazi. To a Nazi him mixing his blood with a non white is treason to his race and his ancestors.

White supremacist then.

Why would a White Supremacist have a non-white wife?  This isn't "I have a black friend" this is someone choosing to spend the rest of their lives with someone of another race.

Why would a sexist anti-feminist have a wife?

Racism works differently than sexism.

It really doesn't. Same mindset leads to both.

You don't see sexists calling for the genocide of women, a males-only nation, or forcing men and women to live on different sides of cities.  It manifests itself very differently.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

McInnes is utter garbage, but he's obviously not a Nazi, as he married a non white woman and has mixed kids.

Racist men often marry out of race to assert their superiority. This is not evidence.

It is evidence that he is not a Nazi. To a Nazi him mixing his blood with a non white is treason to his race and his ancestors.

White supremacist then.

Why would a White Supremacist have a non-white wife?  This isn't "I have a black friend" this is someone choosing to spend the rest of their lives with someone of another race.

His wife is East Asian. To most white supremacists, East Asians (especially Japanese) are well respected and their women considered viable sexual partners and sometimes championed as better than Western white women because they "aren't corrupted by feminism." So they supposedly make better, more obedient and submissive wives, just like White women used to when they "knew their place."

I know they think that Asians are better than other minorities.  But I'd still think that most of them would be against any type of "race-mixing."

An alt-rightist once told me that "whites who prefer Asians should be deported to North Korea."

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

McInnes is utter garbage, but he's obviously not a Nazi, as he married a non white woman and has mixed kids.

Racist men often marry out of race to assert their superiority. This is not evidence.

It is evidence that he is not a Nazi. To a Nazi him mixing his blood with a non white is treason to his race and his ancestors.

White supremacist then.

Why would a White Supremacist have a non-white wife?  This isn't "I have a black friend" this is someone choosing to spend the rest of their lives with someone of another race.

His wife is East Asian. To most white supremacists, East Asians (especially Japanese) are well respected and their women considered viable sexual partners and sometimes championed as better than Western white women because they "aren't corrupted by feminism." So they supposedly make better, more obedient and submissive wives, just like White women used to when they "knew their place."

I know they think that Asians are better than other minorities.  But I'd still think that most of them would be against any type of "race-mixing."

An alt-rightist once told me that "whites who prefer Asians should be deported to North Korea."

Understand that the "alt right" is definitely not a homogenous group, especially not of ideas.

I understand.  I've been fighting the alt-right since July of 2015.  There seems to be a common theme of "whites shouldn't marry non-whites."  Some say that it's okay to have sex with Asians, but not to marry them.  These people are considered "moderate" by alt-right standards.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

This guy was beaten by these scumbags for being a Trump supporter.


Absolute filth. And those on this thread who support and/or excuse this behavior, are not only scumbags, but are both fascist and domestic terrorists.



No one on the lefts condemns this garbage. Howard Dean even congratulated these scumbags. These people will one day reap what they sow.

You have it backward. This is you and your ilk reaping what you've sown. This is the sort of "political discourse" the American NazisRepublicans have encouraged for years. This is EXACTLY what Pussygrabber supporters voted for. They're just upset at finding themselves on the receiving end. We are all lucky it hasn't come to gunfire yet, the way your Dear Leader Pussygrabber wanted:

The American NazisRepublicans want to spend years advocating political violence and trashing democracy? Fine. But when they start reaping the whirlwind, all I'm going to do is point at the hypocrisy and revel in the schadenfreude, because my sympathy for them is dead and gone.

And the right did nothing.  We have our fair share of crazies on the right, I won't deny that.  But the "second amendment people" did nothing.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

This guy was beaten by these scumbags for being a Trump supporter.


Absolute filth. And those on this thread who support and/or excuse this behavior, are not only scumbags, but are both fascist and domestic terrorists.



No one on the lefts condemns this garbage. Howard Dean even congratulated these scumbags. These people will one day reap what they sow.

You have it backward. This is you and your ilk reaping what you've sown. This is the sort of "political discourse" the American NazisRepublicans have encouraged for years. This is EXACTLY what Pussygrabber supporters voted for. They're just upset at finding themselves on the receiving end. We are all lucky it hasn't come to gunfire yet, the way your Dear Leader Pussygrabber wanted:

The American NazisRepublicans want to spend years advocating political violence and trashing democracy? Fine. But when they start reaping the whirlwind, all I'm going to do is point at the hypocrisy and revel in the schadenfreude, because my sympathy for them is dead and gone.

And the right did nothing.  We have our fair share of crazies on the right, I won't deny that.  But the "second amendment people" did nothing.

Because Clinton didn't win.

They did nothing under Obama.  I'm trying to be fair here, but political violence in 2010s America is mostly left-wing.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

This guy was beaten by these scumbags for being a Trump supporter.


Absolute filth. And those on this thread who support and/or excuse this behavior, are not only scumbags, but are both fascist and domestic terrorists.



No one on the lefts condemns this garbage. Howard Dean even congratulated these scumbags. These people will one day reap what they sow.

You have it backward. This is you and your ilk reaping what you've sown. This is the sort of "political discourse" the American NazisRepublicans have encouraged for years. This is EXACTLY what Pussygrabber supporters voted for. They're just upset at finding themselves on the receiving end. We are all lucky it hasn't come to gunfire yet, the way your Dear Leader Pussygrabber wanted:

The American NazisRepublicans want to spend years advocating political violence and trashing democracy? Fine. But when they start reaping the whirlwind, all I'm going to do is point at the hypocrisy and revel in the schadenfreude, because my sympathy for them is dead and gone.

And the right did nothing.  We have our fair share of crazies on the right, I won't deny that.  But the "second amendment people" did nothing.

Because Clinton didn't win.

They did nothing under Obama.  I'm trying to be fair here, but political violence in 2010s America is mostly left-wing.

Gabby Gifford says hi.

From what I remember her shooter had severe mental issues and wasn't really left or right.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

But the right-wingers didn't commit violence against leftists.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

But the right-wingers didn't commit violence against leftists.

https://www.propublica.org/article/ny-cop-salutes-violence-against-trump-protester-online-post-under-review

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Okay, I stand corrected.  But in the year 2017 it is clearly the left that is doing more political violence.  Right-wingers don't smash windows and assault people when a left-wing speaker comes on campus and then justify it as "fighting Communism."

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

But the right-wingers didn't commit violence against leftists.

https://www.propublica.org/article/ny-cop-salutes-violence-against-trump-protester-online-post-under-review

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Okay, I stand corrected.  But in the year 2017 it is clearly the left that is doing more political violence.  Right-wingers don't smash windows and assault people when a left-wing speaker comes on campus and then justify it as "fighting Communism."

People don't tend to be violent when they control the Presidency, Congress, Supreme Court, and to a lesser extent the military and the police. Did you hear of any big Black Panther marches under Obama (even though he wasn't sympathetic to their cause)? Has there been a May 1968 style socialist uprising under Hollande? Do we see massive pro-Putin riots in Russia? No, because it wouldn't make sense to cause destruction when your guy is in charge. And let me reiterate, the people causing violence at these things are largely apolitical anarchists. It's not people who caucused for Hillary or Sanders (okay, maybe a couple) but the vast majority are just anti-establishment extremists who will justify it by associating themselves with whatever movement is en vogue at the moment.

I understand that the violent rioters are a fringe minority.  I hope I didn't come off as thinking that the average Democrat is like this.

But we just didn't see similar right-wing violence in the last 8 years.  When Sanders went to speak at Liberty University, students (or outside agitators) didn't smash windows and then justify it by comparing Sanders to Stalin.

I'm trying to be fair to both sides.  My own party has done things that disgust me and I am very critical of the current administration.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

But the right-wingers didn't commit violence against leftists.

https://www.propublica.org/article/ny-cop-salutes-violence-against-trump-protester-online-post-under-review

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Okay, I stand corrected.  But in the year 2017 it is clearly the left that is doing more political violence.  Right-wingers don't smash windows and assault people when a left-wing speaker comes on campus and then justify it as "fighting Communism."

People don't tend to be violent when they control the Presidency, Congress, Supreme Court, and to a lesser extent the military and the police. Did you hear of any big Black Panther marches under Obama (even though he wasn't sympathetic to their cause)? Has there been a May 1968 style socialist uprising under Hollande? Do we see massive pro-Putin riots in Russia? No, because it wouldn't make sense to cause destruction when your guy is in charge. And let me reiterate, the people causing violence at these things are largely apolitical anarchists. It's not people who caucused for Hillary or Sanders (okay, maybe a couple) but the vast majority are just anti-establishment extremists who will justify it by associating themselves with whatever movement is en vogue at the moment.

I understand that the violent rioters are a fringe minority.  I hope I didn't come off as thinking that the average Democrat is like this.

But we just didn't see similar right-wing violence in the last 8 years.  When Sanders went to speak at Liberty University, students (or outside agitators) didn't smash windows and then justify it by comparing Sanders to Stalin.

I'm trying to be fair to both sides.  My own party has done things that disgust me and I am very critical of the current administration.

Bruh...Hillary used to have to wear bulletproof vests as first lady:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's a sad fact of life, but if you are the President or the first lady or the Vice President, or a member of the cabinet, there are going to be people who want to kill you.  This has been the case for a long time and it will continue to be the case a long time from now.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

But the right-wingers didn't commit violence against leftists.

https://www.propublica.org/article/ny-cop-salutes-violence-against-trump-protester-online-post-under-review

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Okay, I stand corrected.  But in the year 2017 it is clearly the left that is doing more political violence.  Right-wingers don't smash windows and assault people when a left-wing speaker comes on campus and then justify it as "fighting Communism."

People don't tend to be violent when they control the Presidency, Congress, Supreme Court, and to a lesser extent the military and the police. Did you hear of any big Black Panther marches under Obama (even though he wasn't sympathetic to their cause)? Has there been a May 1968 style socialist uprising under Hollande? Do we see massive pro-Putin riots in Russia? No, because it wouldn't make sense to cause destruction when your guy is in charge. And let me reiterate, the people causing violence at these things are largely apolitical anarchists. It's not people who caucused for Hillary or Sanders (okay, maybe a couple) but the vast majority are just anti-establishment extremists who will justify it by associating themselves with whatever movement is en vogue at the moment.

I understand that the violent rioters are a fringe minority.  I hope I didn't come off as thinking that the average Democrat is like this.

But we just didn't see similar right-wing violence in the last 8 years.  When Sanders went to speak at Liberty University, students (or outside agitators) didn't smash windows and then justify it by comparing Sanders to Stalin.

I'm trying to be fair to both sides.  My own party has done things that disgust me and I am very critical of the current administration.

Bruh...Hillary used to have to wear bulletproof vests as first lady:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

It's a sad fact of life, but if you are the President or the first lady or the Vice President, or a member of the cabinet, there are going to be people who want to kill you.  This has been the case for a long time and it will continue to be the case a long time from now.

It seems weird that right-wingers wanted to shoot Hillary for trying to get universal health care of all things

It would be like lefties trying to shoot Trump for trying to cut taxes

No one actually shot her.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

This guy seems like your standard 2017 right winger. Spencer I get, even Milo I can understand, but why McInnes?

Because Antifa views everything as Fascist.