Who would you have voted for--Republican primaries?

[© tweed]

"In 2000 the Republicans were so sick of being defeated by their moral enemy Clinton (including their self-inflicted wound from the moronic impeachment attempt...remember they spent $50 million and an enormous amount of time to investigate a blow job instead of, say, Islamic terrorist networks.)"

Yeah, they do have a little bit of a liberal bias.

[© tweed]

1972 Nixon
1976 Ford
1980 Anderson
1984 Reagan (puke)
1988 Kemp
1992 Bush
1996 Forbes
2000 McCain
2004 Bush (puke)

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes, it's very biased.  But the maps are useful, and the commentary is humorous.

[© tweed]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ick...

[© tweed]

He could have voted for him in '68 too

I forgot about that.

Reagan actually lost twice ('68 and '76) and won twice ('80 and '84), so Reagan is just as much of a loser as he is a winner.

[© tweed]

Reagan is just as much of a loser as he is a winner.

ummm no not really to me at least theres a big dif. between losing primarie elections and general ones

Reagan would have lost the general in 1968 and 1976 by alot.

[© tweed]

Probably yes, though he might have hurt Carter's support in the South.

People weren't going to elect someone as conservative as Reagan until they were in dire staraits, which is what the case was in 1976.  He would have lost like Goldwater in '68, but been respectable in defeat in 1976.