If you could change the winner of an election...

[© tweed]

I only get one election?  

Gore in 2000.

[© tweed]

I would want Hoover to run in 1920, not Harding.

Hoover would have lost in 1920.  Harding won on his charisma.

[© tweed]

The only thing I knew about him was the Great Depression and record job loss. Never looked at anything else, really. Perhaps I should read up on him since he might not be that bad.

He did good things before he was president, such as heading the Food Administration.  But he was an awful president.

[© tweed]

assuming I have to change it to a major party nominee, it has to be Gore2000 even though I probably wouldn't have voted for him... it would be nice to have that one back

[© tweed]

assuming I have to change it to a major party nominee, it has to be Gore2000 even though I probably wouldn't have voted for him... it would be nice to have that one back

I hate the Mushy Middle.

what does that mean

[© tweed]

obviously you haven't been following my career here very closely.  not that you have any moral obligation to do so, but before you draw up a thesis based on 67 assumptions, you probably should do some research


I would have abstained from voting Gore *because* he did so much of what you just said (along with general distaste for the Clinton admin post-'94), not in spite of it

[© tweed]

I just realized why the other secularists don't like you