biblical inerrancy

[© tweed]

pure doctrinalism.  to me it is inimical to the quest for Christ.  the texts range from being written decades after the death of Christ through, what a few decades from 325?  the idea of an inerrant bible I cannot wrap my head around.  the men who put pen to paper, ice pick to stone, are just as flawed as you and I.  I don't believe that God channels people and makes them perfect for x purpose or y period of time.  the Bible is dripping with the Holy Spirit and is obviously inspired by it, I agree; but to treat it orthodoxly is putting faith in men and Nicaea, not in Christ.  ask him, he knows all the answers. f*** any text