Trump: 4 years or 8 years? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 10:00:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Trump: 4 years or 8 years? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump: 4 years or 8 years?  (Read 5524 times)
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,364
United States


P P P
« on: December 24, 2016, 01:09:14 PM »
Quote from: Pericles on December 23, 2016, 05:11:53 PM
Also, Trump could be impeached. He has already shown a lack of regard to the law and the Constitution. He is scandal-prone, and already historically unpopular. There are his conflicts of interest and other scandals. Allan Lichtman, the professor who predicted Trump's win based on his scientific model, has also predicted his impeachment.
Why does the fact that Lichtman's model has finally been discredited give him credence?
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,364
United States


P P P
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2016, 03:33:39 PM »
Quote from: Pericles on December 24, 2016, 02:41:46 PM
Quote from: SpookyWE on December 24, 2016, 01:09:14 PM
Quote from: Pericles on December 23, 2016, 05:11:53 PM
Also, Trump could be impeached. He has already shown a lack of regard to the law and the Constitution. He is scandal-prone, and already historically unpopular. There are his conflicts of interest and other scandals. Allan Lichtman, the professor who predicted Trump's win based on his scientific model, has also predicted his impeachment.
Why does the fact that Lichtman's model has finally been discredited give him credence?

He predicted Trump's win, and so did other scientific, fundamentals-based models.
He is model predicted Trump would win the popular vote. That did not happen, so his model was discredited. (also calling the 13 keys "scientific" would be really, really, really, really, really, really, really stupid, even if they held up this year)
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,364
United States


P P P
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2016, 10:52:41 AM »
Quote from: Spicy Purrito on December 24, 2016, 05:41:23 PM
Quote from: SpookyWE on December 24, 2016, 03:33:39 PM
Quote from: Pericles on December 24, 2016, 02:41:46 PM
Quote from: SpookyWE on December 24, 2016, 01:09:14 PM
Quote from: Pericles on December 23, 2016, 05:11:53 PM
Also, Trump could be impeached. He has already shown a lack of regard to the law and the Constitution. He is scandal-prone, and already historically unpopular. There are his conflicts of interest and other scandals. Allan Lichtman, the professor who predicted Trump's win based on his scientific model, has also predicted his impeachment.
Why does the fact that Lichtman's model has finally been discredited give him credence?

He predicted Trump's win, and so did other scientific, fundamentals-based models.
He is model predicted Trump would win the popular vote. That did not happen, so his model was discredited. (also calling the 13 keys "scientific" would be really, really, really, really, really, really, really stupid, even if they held up this year)
Didn't the model flip when he thought Hillary lost the incumency advantage?
I don't think so? I don't recall Hillary ever being president, so I'm not sure why she'd have that?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 10 queries.