They're free to continue the strategy that got them crushed in 2014 if they want
>2 point loss in a single-issue campaign against one of the best recruits of the cycle
>crushed
condom haters gonna hate
Im not talking just about Colorado but in several senate and gubernatorial elections Dems ran accusing their opponents of a "war on women" but lost because only a small amount of (albeit sometimes deep-pocketed) idiots will base their votes only on the abortion issue. If you dissagree you can ask governors Mary Burke and Wendy Davis
I was implying that Michael Roberson wanted to ban condoms like Gardner did
Uhm... do you know that Senator Gardner sponsored a Senate Bill that want to make birth control pills easier to afford and more accessible?
That bill also makes women pay for their birth control instead of insurance, which makes it actually harder to afford. I've been following this because my senator is also sponsoring it and I'm disgusted that she wants to take away my condoms
Which brings up the question of why birth control, in particular, has to be free. Even if we accept it as an essential thing for a women to have access to, the obvious counterargument is that other prescriptions that are essential for some people, such as allergy medication, antibiotics, and insulin injections, don't come with a guranteed copay of $0. I agree that Birth Control should be avaliable and affordable, but I don't understand why it is the one drug that the left insists is absolutely free for everyone, including those who can afford to make a 10, 20 dollar copay without any problem.
Generally the concensus among leftists is that all drugs and healthcare should be free.