Pacific Referendum Rights Bill (Failed)

[Potus]

Mr. Speaker,

No matter where one stands on issues of consolidation, regional rights, or even secession, our nation was founded on the consent of the governed. The federal government has grown in such tremendous power that it has robbed the regions, and by extension their people, of the powers they were intended to have. While I'm not an angry firebreather on the issue of the regions, the facts support allowing the Pacific an opportunity to provide a direct referendum on Nyman's governance.

Efforts have been made by powers on high to "save the Pacific" while all we really need is the power to govern our land, people, and society.

This legislation would provide the people of the Pacific opportunities to give or deny consent to federal governance. No matter where you are on th issue, we can all agree the people have a right to self determination. If you are confident that the Republic continues to serve the interests of the people, then you have nothing to fear by allowing referenda on federal power.

[Potus]

Mr. Potus I believe secession is illegal.

Not if you pass a law changing it's legality.

[Potus]

Mr. Potus I believe secession is illegal.

Not if you pass a law changing it's legality.

This senate more than likely won't given that many of them opposed the Northeast Independence Movement.

The Pacific Freedom Party is operating firmly within the confines of the law and existin political system. This bill isn't  secession. This bill provides an avenue for a referendum on federal power over the Pacific region. Do you believe people have a right to hold these votes?