Why did left-leaning journalists/pundits favor hillary so much over bernie? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 04:38:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why did left-leaning journalists/pundits favor hillary so much over bernie? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did left-leaning journalists/pundits favor hillary so much over bernie?  (Read 2366 times)
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,059


« on: August 05, 2017, 04:54:40 PM »

Whether it be Nate COhn, harry enten, nate silver, the wapo, nyt, or most journalists and writers for those papers, you could always tell they were distrustful at best, and openly hostile at worst, of bernie during the primary.

My question is why? Journalism, at least in the past, has always aligned itself with muckraking and exposing the corruption of those in power.

Bernie seemed like a good compliment to such sentiments.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,059


« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2017, 08:55:38 PM »

Bernie Sanders ran a primary campaign EONS ahead of hillary when it came to substance.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 11 queries.