Computer89 v. The Atlasian Senate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 12:59:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Computer89 v. The Atlasian Senate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Computer89 v. The Atlasian Senate  (Read 3670 times)
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« on: June 25, 2023, 08:04:24 PM »

How do you think the Senate would effectuate this part of the clause:

Quote
the Senate may adopt rules concerning the discipline and expulsion of its members

What would it look like for the Senate to "adopt rules"? Could the impeachment trial convened by the Senate in this case be said to be an instance of the Senate "adopting rules" that would allow it to expel a member?
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2023, 10:32:02 AM »

How do you think the Senate would effectuate this part of the clause:

Quote
the Senate may adopt rules concerning the discipline and expulsion of its members

What would it look like for the Senate to "adopt rules"? Could the impeachment trial convened by the Senate in this case be said to be an instance of the Senate "adopting rules" that would allow it to expel a member?

Given the enumerated discretion of the Senate to adopt its own rules and proceedings, I would imagine that the adoption of rules need not be explicit or even done ex ante, so long as it is sufficiently clear to the Senate as a body what "rules" are being adopted. Past practice or conduct not objected to could implicitly create the adoption of rules.

To that end, I don't think there is a constitutional bar to implicitly "adopting rules" that structure an expulsion like an impeachment trial, so long as the impeachment-specific penalties that go beyond the scope of the Senate's powers do not attach in the end (i.e. ban on running for offices under the Atlasian Constitution). If the Senate meant the impeachment as a simple expulsion, then I think that expulsion would be valid, but I can't speak for the Senate on this front.

I would also be very curious to hear the Senate's thoughts about that issue rather than having you conjecture about them. *clears throat, stares expectantly at the blank space where the Senate should have someone*
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2023, 07:14:57 PM »

The Court has determined that if the Senate does not post its brief by end of day Eastern Time on the Second of July, the plaintiff will be declared the winner of this case by default.

This policy shall also apply to all future deadlines for briefs set by this Court unless an extension is explicitly asked for and granted.

Hear, hear!
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2023, 08:25:01 AM »

Same question for you, Lumine, if you please:

How do you think the Senate would effectuate this part of the clause:

Quote
the Senate may adopt rules concerning the discipline and expulsion of its members

What would it look like for the Senate to "adopt rules"? Could the impeachment trial convened by the Senate in this case be said to be an instance of the Senate "adopting rules" that would allow it to expel a member?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.