Why is ageism socially acceptable? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 05:35:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Why is ageism socially acceptable? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is ageism socially acceptable?  (Read 825 times)
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,022
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« on: September 26, 2020, 10:52:22 PM »

Hot take ... ageism toward younger people should be 1,000 times more acceptable than ageism toward older people.  The latter is completely tasteless and void of class.
It depends on the kind of ageism we're talking about.

Discriminating against politicians because they're too old? If they're mentally sharp, there is no legitimate reason to hold their age against them, and to attack someone on it like Castro did against Biden is classless. The same thing would apply to businesses hiring for most jobs, as long as the person is physically and mentally capable of performing their duties.

For other things, ageism against older people is perfectly justified. Countries discriminate based on age for immigrants, because it's in their national interest to do so. Youth-oriented programs and groups should not be obligated to open up membership to people of any age. There is nothing wrong with a company having a mandatory retirement age.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,022
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2020, 12:23:46 AM »

Because age isn't immutable. You may not have control over it, but it will change. This is why it is considered more acceptable to discriminate against the young than against the old.
Sexual orientation isn't immutable, either. Or gender, for that matter.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,022
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2020, 10:19:00 PM »

Is it acceptable to say that Joe Biden should not be the president because he is 78? Only if you proove that he doesn't have enough health. Otherwise, it would be discrimination like sex, sexual orientation, religion and color.
Considering the other extreme: the law says that the minimal age to be the president is 35 and this age is OK. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez will be 35 in 2024 and I see no problem in her running to president. Alexander, the Great, passed away when he was 32, and he was ruling an empire that went from Macedonia to Persia.
Alexander was a hereditary monarch, not an elected leader of a republic. A better comparison would be the Founding Fathers, many of whom were very young, but they were basically the alt-right of their time.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.