Yeah. If Dems do better with hispanics in Florida and Arizona but worse with wealthier socially liberal whites, they could lose Minnesota and New Hampshire. New Hampshire would make it a tie with the house of representatives picking the winner whereas just Minnesota would be enough for the republican nominee to win.
That said, I would still expect Florida to vote to the right of the nation for the time being.
The GOP did not lose New Hampshire because they didn't do well enough with wealthy Whites, what on Earth are you smoking?
$30k-$49.9k: 47% DEM, 45% GOP
$50k-$99.9k: 50% DEM, 46% GOP
$100k-$199.9k: 48% GOP, 47% DEM
In Minnesota, Trump's epic collapse among traditionally GOP voters in wealthier areas probably cost him the state (his "gains" with lower income voters and rural voters were so modest that they didn't even kind of make up for it), but you're completely off with New Hampshire.
Those are middle-income brackets...
And no, Florida does not exist in a vacuum, so losing Florida would almost certainly close other paths to victory, barring a 3-way race or some other scenario that changes the game in the rest of the country.
