Why the (once) failing New York Times loves Trump

[Santander]

This is not particularly useful information in a vacuum. Do you have information on their print subscription dropoffs?

[Santander]

This is not particularly useful information in a vacuum. Do you have information on their print subscription dropoffs?

They are certainly dropping off at the same rate, but it doesn't matter, as overall earnings are up and Times corporate undoubtedly views digital as their future.

Well, of course digital is the future. (actually, it's the present) But the main reason I was interested in print dropoffs is that as a news organization, advertising and subscription revenues pay the bills, but the number of eyeballs that read your stories play a big role in determining how relevant you are.

[Santander]

Really? This is best you have? I wonder why a paper might want to get early access to a potential story about someone running for President.

Did they run any articles "confirming" what's written in Clinton Cash? Did they try to sow doubt in people's minds about Hillary using that book's claims? If no to both of those questions, then you have no case.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

[Santander]

Admit it, Naso, straight up. You want to beat the left more than advance the Right's goals. Or well, actually you did. 

This is the goal of the vast majority of conservatives.