Ohio Sheriff Refuses to let Officers Carry Narcan (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 06:07:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Ohio Sheriff Refuses to let Officers Carry Narcan (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ohio Sheriff Refuses to let Officers Carry Narcan  (Read 1555 times)
Fight for Trump
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,073
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« on: July 10, 2017, 10:21:39 AM »
« edited: July 10, 2017, 10:23:51 AM by Santander »

I think Butler County is often lauded for being quite progressive in its handling of non-violent drug offenders compared to neighboring Franklin County in Indiana, which also struggles with drug abuse. This is not a matter of "taxpayer dollars" or "heartlessness". Basically this:

The sheriff's main point was that he believes it's not safe for his officers to administer it and should be left up to the paramedics.   He should have left the "taxpayer" stuff out of it.
Logged
Fight for Trump
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,073
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2017, 01:15:17 PM »

What exactly is not safe? That they wake up agitated and possibly violent? Isn't handling violent people a big part of a police officer's job? And exactly how dangerous would they be if they start out from a semi-conscious state where the officers have the advantage of being prepared for any potential outburst? I mean they could even restrain the person prior to administering the drug.
Police are sometimes involved in dangerous situations as part of their job, but that does not mean we should create more dangerous situations for them.

It is sometimes difficult for even trained individuals to tell the difference between someone having an opioid overdose and another type of overdose, or something else altogether. Where there is a known opioid overdose situation, paramedics should be dispatched to the site simultaneously with the police. Where the situation is less clear, there is no need to expose a lone police officer to a potentially dangerous situation that might, if all the circumstances line up correctly, merely allow the addict to "live" until their next overdose, potentially committing crimes to feed their habit.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.