Comey Senate Intelligence Committee Testimony Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 01:56:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Comey Senate Intelligence Committee Testimony Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Comey Senate Intelligence Committee Testimony Thread  (Read 11694 times)
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,031
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« on: June 08, 2017, 09:45:56 AM »

They happen to disagree with their recollection of the details of the events that occurred.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,031
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2017, 09:55:30 AM »

lol, Risch has as much disregard for the chain of command as Trump. If the chief executive of the executive branch tells one of his employees (a Presidential appointee, at that) that he "hopes" they do something, it is basically an order.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,031
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2017, 12:09:30 PM »

Comey's memos were "saved for later." Later happened to be after he was fired. Could it be that Comey was blackmailing the President?

Blackmailing him with a conversation in which Trump himself overstepped multiple times? No. He probably foresaw all of this.
So why did he leak them only after he was fired?
I'm sure he saved the memos to try to resolve the situation through the appropriate channels. The DOJ was very much in flux at the time. When he got fired, he got cut off from the "appropriate channels".
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,031
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2017, 01:55:01 PM »

MUH FREEDUMB
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,031
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2017, 02:17:11 PM »

Oh and Trump's lawyers and aides will be believable if we get them under oath to swear Comey is unequivocally wrong. They should offer to swear out that statement in testimony to Congress. Until then they're full of it because at this point only one side has sworn under oath.
Showboat swore an oath did he. I guess that makes him super duper trustworthy.

Compared to the other side that didn't swear on oath in their statements? Yep.

     People lie under oath all the time. I don't necessarily disbelieve Comey, but I am convinced at this point of something I have suspected since last October; namely, that he is a compulsive attention seeker. That tendency casts doubt on much of what he says.

Surely this describes Trump more than Comey.
Trump just likes being a shiny object.

Comey thinks he's a sheriff bringing truth and justice to the Wild West. His type of attention-seeking happens to be productive, but is also filled with arrière-pensées.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.