Explain the rape/incest exception to being pro-life (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 04:02:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Explain the rape/incest exception to being pro-life (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Explain the rape/incest exception to being pro-life  (Read 2392 times)
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,015
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61
« on: January 28, 2017, 08:48:58 PM »
The right to self-defense has always been understood to have been applicable even when the "attacker" is not morally culpable, as in the case of an unborn child. It is sad, and I'm personally torn on the issue, but I have always respected those who support such exceptions.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,015
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2017, 11:16:17 PM »
Quote from: publicunofficial on January 29, 2017, 11:14:00 PM
(Unless you're the type of scumbag who think women should share fault in being raped)
It's either rape or it's not. I don't know anyone who believes there is such thing as "shared fault" in rape.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 9 queries.