Texas elector threatens to not vote Trump (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:19:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Texas elector threatens to not vote Trump (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Texas elector threatens to not vote Trump  (Read 2164 times)
Fight for Trump
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,048
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« on: August 25, 2016, 06:55:12 PM »

This simply shouldn't be allowed, regardless of what you think of the candidate.

No. It should be allowed. There should always be a check on the masses.
Why even have elections?
Logged
Fight for Trump
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,048
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2016, 07:03:07 PM »

This simply shouldn't be allowed, regardless of what you think of the candidate.

No. It should be allowed. There should always be a check on the masses.
Why even have elections?
Why have an electoral college? I agree that this is a pointless and dumb idea by the elector, but what's the college's point if electors are 100% bound? That might as well by a PV election, then.
Well first, having an electoral college comprised solely of bound electors would still be different than a straight PV election. But more importantly, preserving tradition is important, we can't just take an iconoclast view of government and start tearing down whatever institution we feel is outdated.

The votes cast by faithless electors through history, when looking back, tell us a lot about that election. I don't feel there's a need to bind electors, but openly threatening to defy the voters because of a bogus "conscience" reason is ridiculous, since electors do not exist to express their individual conscience, even if there was a conscience issue. Endorsing that kind of thinking is just as outrageous.
Logged
Fight for Trump
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,048
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2016, 07:30:17 PM »

But more importantly, preserving tradition is important, we can't just take an iconoclast view of government and start tearing down whatever institution we feel is outdated.
Why not? If the tradition is dumb, shouldn't we get rid of it?

There may be arguments in favor of keeping the electoral college, but "that's the way it's always been" isn't one of them. Article V exists for a reason.
Let's start with the Department of Education then.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.