Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 03:53:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did Clinton do as well as expected on ST?  (Read 4797 times)
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,912
United Kingdom


« on: March 02, 2016, 02:13:07 AM »

With the exception of Oklahoma, I'd say yes. The media may try to spin double-digit losses in Colorado and Minnesota as setbacks, but those are easily offset by her win in Massachusetts and her completely dominant performance in the South.

Pretty much this. Winning in Oklahoma would have bee good for Clinton, and I feel the night is about average for Clinton. As long as she can tie up Ohio, Florida and Illinois she sould be okay
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,912
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2016, 06:02:01 AM »

Why are Bernie bots claiming that Hillary's victories in southern states don't count because 'muh Confederacy' and 'muh red states'. Obama won the majority of red states in the 2008 primary IIRC, and its states like Texas, South Carolina and Virginia where HRC needs to be getting her vote out in.

It's like these stupid allegations of voter fraud-no matter what happens it will never be enough
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.