Opinion of the atomic bombings of Japan (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 11:30:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Opinion of the atomic bombings of Japan (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Hiroshima and Nagasaki should have been bombed as IRL.
 
#2
The atomic bomb should not have been used at all.
 
#3
A single bomb should have been dropped on a less populated area, and Japan should have received more time to surrender.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 72

Author Topic: Opinion of the atomic bombings of Japan  (Read 6331 times)
kikka
Newbie
*
Posts: 6
Japan


« on: November 01, 2013, 05:44:05 AM »

Why USA didn't drop an atomic bomb on Tokyo is that they wanted accurate experimental results of atomic bombs.At that time Tokyo was greatly destroyed by many air attacks while Hiroshima wasn't. Since Hiroshima had been never bombed before the atomic bomb,damages by atomic bombs were very clear. Hardly had the war ended when they sent an investigating commission (not doctors) to Hiroshima to investigate atomic bomb victims.

Japan was astonished by invasion by Soviet Union rather than atomic bombs, I think. This is because Japan wanted Soviet Union  to mediate between Japan and allies.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.