Which party would theoretically benefit more from 100% turnout / mandatory voting? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 21, 2024, 04:55:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Which party would theoretically benefit more from 100% turnout / mandatory voting? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which party would theoretically benefit more from 100% turnout / mandatory voting?  (Read 1177 times)
IceAgeComing
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,589
United Kingdom


« on: December 02, 2020, 06:25:45 PM »

and a large chunk of that 8% will either be people that planned to vote on the day but had a legitimate reason not to (things like a sudden medical emergency preventing you from planning an alternative way to vote) or people still listed on the electoral roll that can't vote: people who've died in the time between the roll being last updated and the election, or people that have moved away but are still registered at their old address.  A true 100% turnout isn't really possible: an official 92% turnout is in reality probably a percent or two higher than that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.