Airline Protection Bill (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 11:28:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Airline Protection Bill (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Airline Protection Bill  (Read 3067 times)
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

« on: January 04, 2007, 08:16:28 PM »

Well I don't really agree with either Section 4 or 5. I believe that whatever company, either foreign or domestic, should be able to fly domestic routes and any foreign company should be allowed to own any amount of stock in a Airline.

Airlines are no different in their value to Atlasia than any other corporation. By restricting foreign investment into the airline infrastructure we are sending a protectionist message to the rest of the world and continuing to treat airlines as a seperate and more important entity than other national corporations.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2007, 09:21:23 PM »


It's time Atlasia started to put the interests of our domestic airlines first and foremost. Perhaps closing our domestic routes to foreign airlines will, how shall I put it, persuade those governments to open their domestic routes to ours.

No, not at all. I believe that closing Atlasian domestic routes would make foreign countries close their domestic routes to Atlasian airlines. That's as logical as saying "by installing large tarriff barriers we will encourage other countries to get rid of theirs".

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Atlasia has a population of 300 million people, the rest of the world has over 5.7 billion people and I'm guessing a good amount of those are in need of some sort of air transport at some point during their lives. I have to say that the world market for Atlasian airlines is huge and the market in Atlasia for foreign airlines to invest in is large when compared to other countries and would thus be a major draw to international corporations.

Why can banks, which are probably just as important and asset if not more important than airlines, be owned by foreign entities, corporations and persons but not airlines? I would say that the economic pull of such companies as HSBC, ABN Amro and Royal Bank of Scotland are much more important and would have a much larger effect on the Atlasian economy than an Atlasian airline market which allows foreign carries to run domestic routes.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2007, 09:42:25 PM »

I would like to propose an amendment:

Sections 4 and 5 are struck and replaced with:

4. There are to be no limits upon airline investment by foreign corporations or persons in Atlasia.

5. Any airline, whether foreign or domestic, has the right to fly on domestic routes unless prohibited through government action by the Republic of Atlasia.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2007, 09:28:04 PM »

Well first off my amendment was completely ignored by both the former PPT and by the Vice President in clear violation of the rules.

However I'm just going to vote a big Nay on this bill.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.