Dittman research: Murkowski is set to lose (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 03:35:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  Dittman research: Murkowski is set to lose (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Dittman research: Murkowski is set to lose  (Read 2807 times)
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

« on: August 16, 2006, 04:04:06 PM »

He appointed his daughter to the US Senate and it appeared he was doing so on because of nepotism, and the economy is also doing badly in AK. Lastly, he or  his daughter have been in gov't for years and haven't been able to past ANWR.

Let's break this down.

1. Yeah he did appoint his daughter to the Senate and it probably was because of nepotism. So +1 for you.

2. Before the pipeline shutdown Alaska was doing great. It had a huge budget surplus and was actually going to give a higher payment to Alaskans, from the dividends of the permanent fund, then the year before. I think Alaska always ranks in the top 15 richest states in the Union. Of course the pipeline shutdown will hurt the economy enormously but Alaska's economy before then was doing quite well, much like other independent petro-states such as the UAE, Saudi Arabia or Azerbaijan.

3. What the hell would ANWR have to do with the Governor? Most Alaskans know that even the stupid blumbling fool Murkowski and daughter have made that a priority. You can't be elected to office in Alaska without making ANWR drilling a priority. Most Alaskans blame the failure of ANWR proposals on enviromentalists from the "Lower 48" who don't get Alaska's needs and to faraway Washington officials who could care less about Alaska. The backlash against Murkowski isn't because, as Governor, he hasn't done anything about ANWR but mostly because he has been shown to be an incompentent Governor and has bumbled the issues most Alaskans are concerned about, local Alaskan problems.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2006, 09:23:01 PM »

I said when he was in the Senate he didn't pass ANWR, and since his daughter is in the senate and can't pass ANWR it may be rubbing off on Murkowski. If it doesn't have an effect, why did Lisa Murkowski use as a campaign against Tony Knowles. Her slim margin was do to the fact that she would be passing ANWR and Tony Knowles, eventhough he was for it, he was associated with the Dems obstructing ANWR.

Yeah and who do you think Alaskans will blame ANWR on? Murkowski and his daughter who have continued to push it while they're in the Senate? Or Democrats who have constantly fought it? The election would have never been close if it had been for those charges of nepotism. Plus I don't even know what this has to do with the Governors race since Murkowski has about as much control over ANWR as I do over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 15 queries.